Rates, Risk, & Taylor Swift
By Peter Tchir, chief strategist at Academy Securities
Rates, Risk and Taylor Swift
Ok, I have nothing useful to add about Taylor Swift, but I couldn’t think of anything else to act as “clickbait” for today’s T-Report.
With the holiday season upon us, it seems like a good time to review a few key drivers that impact the performance (and our views) on rates and risk:
Inflation. We will add some new bullet points to our inflation has rolled over narrative.
The Fed. They are going to sound hawkish but the data is likely to betray them.
Jobs. Sill strong, but I’m looking for cracks in the foundation to appear.
Russia and Ukraine. It seems that we are at a potential inflection point.
China and COVID. Are we just getting “false positive” and hearing what we want to hear, or is there more to the story?
Crypto and Disruption. This continues to be a story and the wealth destruction continues. We think it remains an important issue, not just for those directly involved in the asset, but because of the drag on the economy.
Framing out our view on these issues let’s us set up our views on risk for the coming weeks.
Energy commodity futures took a beating last week, with WTI down 10% on the week and starting to head into some very favorable year on year comparisons.
Housing data was weak, again, with the NAHB (who I view as an optimistic bunch) came in at 33, which is the lowest (except for a brief plunge as COVID shutdown the U.S.) since the 2007-2012 period. This looks bad and I see no reason for optimism given where rates are.
Housing is such an important part of the economy and our own sense of net worth, this is somewhere between problematic and terrifying. A few of the “home supply” retailers seem to deliver better sales than some other areas of retail, but I’m highly suspicious that is because many people are following up on what realtors said they should do to make their house sellable. Probably a bit too cynical, but….
There was a certain degree of hesitancy to use this chart, since I’m not that familiar with it and it almost looks like a typo, but it does fit my assertion that supply chain issues have been dissipating and are practically non-existent which will help keep inflation in check!
Inflation data will generally drift lower and we have more than 3 weeks before the December meeting and a “lifetime” of data ahead of the February meeting.
The Fed and Jobs
The Fed speakers will generally steer the market towards more hiking. They will point to higher stock prices as a problem. Why anyone still thinks that the stock market is an effective judge of anything over the short term is beyond me. I fully expect hawkish leaning rhetoric that markets will ignore more and more as they see the inflation (or even deflation) story developing along the lines we’ve laid out.
On jobs, there is a large divergence between the Household and Establishment portions of the NFP surveys. The last month had a surprisingly large number of jobs attributable to the birth/death model. Finally, jobs are always lagging, and will be more lagging this time as HR will be extremely reluctant to fire people after spending 2 years struggling to higher people.
Weakness will first show up in service providers as companies cut costs in a variety of ways other than letting people go. Firing people will be an absolute last resort and pushing the economy to that point would be a huge mistake!
Finally, we’ve been having a lot of discussions about the Tchir Job Impact Index™. Okay, there is no such index and presumably if I look hard enough, I will find one that gets me the information I’m looking for, which is:
# of Jobs Lost
Average Wage of Jobs Lost
I expect that the job losses we see will be smaller than in past recessions, but will hit at a much higher average pay level. The jobs that will be cut (and are already getting cut) aren’t your basic minimum wage worker, they are more senior and better paying jobs. If economists make a mistake this time around, it will be focusing on the number of jobs, rather than the type of job, because it takes far fewer high paying job cuts to hit the economy than lower paying jobs (the low income job cuts hurt those families and that is awful, but from a broad economic standpoint, fewer but higher paying jobs are drivers).
If someone knows of an index that tracks that, please let me know, otherwise I will start playing with that Tchir Index – the data has to be there somewhere!
Russia and Ukraine
We had a moment of heightened fear of escalation this week as discussed in this SITREP. There is evidence that we are at an inflection point:
Putin seems to be very weak and seems willing to make some peace or truce overtures (possibly at the request of China).
Ukraine seems convinced they can kick Russia out with enough weaponry. At the same time the infrastructure damage is mounting as we head into a season where you wouldn’t want to live in Ukraine without heat!
NATO seems torn between the desire to provide more and better equipment to Ukraine and the mounting costs of these operations, especially with no clear endgame that is acceptable.
The mass migration of Ukrainians is impacting countries and there is an increasing risk that the longer the fighting lasts in Ukraine, the more destruction, the more roots get established elsewhere, the less likely Ukrainians are to return.
More energy sanctions are scheduled, and it is increasingly difficult to see how that hurts Russia any more than it hurts us.
Frozen Rivers. The Geopolitical Intelligence Group continues to point out that Russia’s last best chance at making an East to West push in Ukraine is when the rivers (which flow North to South) freeze and they can cross at places other than easily defendable bridges.
Most of the GIG doesn’t think a resolution is likely, but I’m leaning towards those who think it can be done. It will be difficult to convince Zelensky to give up anything, but the reality is he is fighting with money that isn’t his own and the mounting humanitarian and economic risk create enough incentives to try and get through this winter, at the least.
Any peace would send energy prices plummeting!
For the past few decades, we seem to have two issues with messaging from China:
They say what they think we want them to say, because it works and they don’t care if they don’t follow their own messaging.
They say what they mean and we interpret it to be the message we were hoping for, not the one they actually gave.
I must not be too cynical, especially around COVID 0 policy, because that seems to be in their own best interests to change, but I suspect their current negotiating stance is that they realize our attitude has shifted so much against them, that they should at least pretend to play nice. They know that if we think they are playing nice in the sandbox we will back off and give them breathing room to do what they were going to anyways,
Some nice rallies in Chinese stocks, but it is still un-investible to me!
China will alter their COVID 0 policy but that is a next year event, and despite the boost that would give to commodity demand, it is likely to be deflationary as a whole, since supply chain issues are already minimal and turning their factory back on, would just add to the supply (and inventory) glut that we are building towards.
China is in a resource accumulation “struggle” with us, and is aligning with the autocratic, resource rich nations in the world and that is not changing. That is my overriding premise on China.
Crypto and Disruption
I have long said, half-jokingly that if the nuclear industry had just hired the crypto marketing people, we’d have more nuclear energy than we know what to do with. As more information comes out about the money spent on advertising, naming rights, lobbyists and “influencers” of all shapes and sizes, even I’m aghast. I had a “funny” little tweet a few weeks ago – “What is the difference between a #beaniebaby and a #FTXToken? At least you can hug a beanie baby as you cry yourself to sleep”
I am coming to realize that the amount of money spent trying to pump up crypto is possibly orders of magnitude greater than what was spent on advertising beanie babies and is likely a huge driver of ad spending and social media influencers. That is money that won’t find its way into the economy right now, at least not on anything like the scale prior to that! (though there ae some great spoofs on the Matt Damon “fortune favors the brave” commercial).
I see no way that the wealth destruction that has occurred that looks unlikely to be recouped any time soon, doesn’t hit the economy!
This week all eyes are on the Greyscale trusts, that are now trading at large discounts to NAV and have hit retail investors hard – please read The Difficulty of Calculating NAV in the Crypto Space.
There are ways it could resolve itself positively and that is the hope, but there are a couple of paths that could occur that would give crypto another kick in the teeth.
Definitely tune in to Academy’s Crypto – A Brave New World webinar on Tuesday at 1pm! We are lucky to have Chris Perkins, President of CoinFund and an Academy Advisory Board member lead a discussion on the space. He knows the people involved, very well and is a thought leader in the space!
I do think there is a chance, that if crypto takes another leg down, we see miners start to disappear which would be bad for crypto but great for energy prices!
I like rates. I like owning bonds. Yes, it is a bet on the data coming in weak. It is a bet that if the data comes in weak, it reduces FX volatility and thinking that will also help bond yields globally.
I’m definitely in the camp that the recession is coming sooner (January) and will be deeper and longer than consensus. As such, I have to be long treasuries!
The road to hell is paved with carry, and I hate relying on carry, but you are finally getting paid to take rate risk for the first time in years!
I like bonds. It is a pound the table moment for me! I want to be long bonds (pretty much anywhere on the curve) from now to year-end unless something radical changes my view!
Risk is a little bit more nuanced. My face is flushed from pounding the table on bonds, but now I have to compose myself as the risk story is far more nuanced.
First stage, weaker risk assets for the moment (and I literally mean for the moment).
I think crypto and the disruptive space have one more leg down and it will be difficult for risk to do well as that occurs.
Sentiment indicators are moving too quickly! We swing from overbought to oversold in record time. CNN is back to Greed. The AAII survey has more bulls than any other week this year! While RSI charts (one technical I like) are not overbought, they are certainly not oversold any more.
The Fed wants to talk down the market and will take shots at stocks.
I will be watching Wednesday very closely! If we are going to get a nice “seasonal” bounce, we should get it coming into Wednesday. With my view on rates, I should be comfortable that we get that seasonal rally, but it seems such a consensus trade, I’m not sure it will happen.
Second stage, more “everything rally”.
I could be convinced that this should be the first stage, but I think
The pressure in equities in particular, that started on Wednesday is not over.
Consensus is too bullish.
If we don’t get a nice bump into Thanksgiving, my little “almanac”, actually one of the best traders I talk to, tells me that is bad.
The “everything” rally into year end would be nice and I am convinced on the bond leg of that!
Final stage, is “risk-off”
If my current view on the economy is correct, then the data will start to come in bad enough that bonds rally and risk sells off. We aren’t there yet, but to be honest, there have been a few more moments where it felt like the market is sniffing out this trade, and maybe we’ve already have stage 2 and are into stage 3?
Like bonds. Like steepeners. Risk, slightly cautious on at the moment:
Most nervous about the energy sector and crypto related sectors. Anyone exposed to excess inventories is poised to underperform.
Least nervous about credit and “income oriented” equities. We saw this week that municipal bonds, for example, were well bid, even when treasuries were getting hit. I think the bond rally is powerful enough that it will help these areas outperform other types of risk (credit spreads may leak wider, but will outperform general equities, for example).
From my perspective Russia and China have the greatest potential to be “game changers” to my forecast.
Maybe something will happen, outside of those factors to change my tune on the economy, inflation and jobs, but I think the market will continue to move in my direction too many who got “transitory” wrong last year and are now in the process of getting it wrong in the other direction right now.
Good luck! Hopefully my views on risk weren’t too confusing and now we can get back to our hunt for cheap Taylor Swift tickets.
Mon, 11/21/2022 – 07:40